Projects per year
Abstract
Open Research aims to make research more accessible, transparent, reproducible, shared and collaborative. Doing so is meant to democratize and diversify access to knowledge and knowledge production, and ensure that research is useful outside of academic contexts. Increasing equity is therefore a key aim of the Open Research movement, yet mounting evidence demonstrates that the practices of Open Research are implemented in ways that undermine this. In response, we convened a diverse community of researchers, research managers and funders to co-create actionable recommendations for supporting the equitable implementation of Open Research. Using a co-creative modified Delphi method, we generated consensus-driven recommendations that address three key problem areas: the resource-intensive nature of Open Research, the high cost of article processing charges, and obstructive reward and recognition practices at funders and research institutions that undermine the implementation of Open Research. In this paper, we provide an overview of these issues, a detailed description of the co-creative process, and present the recommendations and the debates that surrounded them. We discuss these recommendations in relation to other recently published ones and conclude that implementing ours requires 'global thinking' to ensure that a systemic and inclusive approach to change is taken.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 221460 |
| Journal | Royal Society Open Science |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2023 |
Keywords
- open science
- open research
- science policy
- open access
- Open data
- open science recommendations
- equity in science
- meta-science
- open science policy
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Toward Equitable Open Research: Stakeholder Co-created Recommendations for Research Institutions, Funders and Researchers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
EU - ON-MERRIT - Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research and Innovation Transition
Wieser, B. (Project manager on research unit)
1/10/19 → 31/03/22
Project: Research project
Activities
-
Dynamics of cumulative advantage in science reform: lessons for Open Research from Diffusion of Innovation theory
Cole, N. L. (Speaker) & Ross-Hellauer, A. (Contributor)
8 May 2023Activity: Talk or presentation › Talk at conference or symposium › Science to science
-
Meta-research methods: Delphi surveys with co-creation
Cole, N. L. (Speaker) & Ross-Hellauer, A. (Speaker)
11 Sept 2023Activity: Talk or presentation › Talk at workshop, seminar or course › Science to public
-
Epistemic Injustice as an Unintended Consequence of Open Science
Cole, N. L. (Speaker) & Klebel, T. (Speaker)
20 Jun 2022Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk at conference or symposium › Science to science
-
The potential of inclusive and collaborative Open Research processes at the science-policy interface
Cole, N. L., Reichmann, S. E. & Ross-Hellauer, T., 11 Jan 2023, (Submitted) In: Science and Public Policy.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
-
Dynamics of Cumulative Advantage and Threats to Equity in Open Science: A Scoping Review
Ross-Hellauer, T., Reichmann, S. E., Cole, N. L., Fessl, A., Klebel, T. & Pontika, N., 2022, In: Royal Society Open Science. 9, 1, 211032.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
Open Access -
Global Thinking: ON-MERRIT Recommendations for Maximising Equity in Open and Responsible Research
Cole, N. L., Reichmann, S. & Ross-Hellauer, T., 14 Mar 2022, 38 p.Research output: Book/Report › Other report
Open Access