TY - JOUR
T1 - Open Science at the generative AI turn
T2 - An exploratory analysis of challenges and opportunities
AU - Hosseini, Mohammad
AU - Horbach, Serge P.J.M.
AU - Holmes, Kristi
AU - Ross-Hellauer, Tony
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Mohammad Hosseini, Serge P. J. M. Horbach, Kristi Holmes, and Tony Ross-Hellauer. Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.
PY - 2025/1/27
Y1 - 2025/1/27
N2 - Technology influences Open Science (OS) practices, because conducting science in transparent, accessible, and participatory ways requires tools and platforms for collaboration and sharing results. Due to this relationship, the characteristics of the employed technologies directly impact OS objectives. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used by researchers for tasks such as text refining, code generation/editing, reviewing literature, and data curation/analysis. Nevertheless, concerns about openness, transparency, and bias suggest that GenAI may benefit from greater engagement with OS. GenAI promises substantial efficiency gains but is currently fraught with limitations that could negatively impact core OS values, such as fairness, transparency, and integrity, and may harm various social actors. In this paper, we explore the possible positive and negative impacts of GenAI on OS. We use the taxonomy within the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science to systematically explore the intersection of GenAI and OS. We conclude that using GenAI could advance key OS objectives by broadening meaningful access to knowledge, enabling efficient use of infrastructure, improving engagement of societal actors, and enhancing dialogue among knowledge systems. However, due to GenAI’s limitations, it could also compromise the integrity, equity, reproducibility, and reliability of research. Hence, sufficient checks, validation, and critical assessments are essential when incorporating GenAI into research workflows.
AB - Technology influences Open Science (OS) practices, because conducting science in transparent, accessible, and participatory ways requires tools and platforms for collaboration and sharing results. Due to this relationship, the characteristics of the employed technologies directly impact OS objectives. Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly used by researchers for tasks such as text refining, code generation/editing, reviewing literature, and data curation/analysis. Nevertheless, concerns about openness, transparency, and bias suggest that GenAI may benefit from greater engagement with OS. GenAI promises substantial efficiency gains but is currently fraught with limitations that could negatively impact core OS values, such as fairness, transparency, and integrity, and may harm various social actors. In this paper, we explore the possible positive and negative impacts of GenAI on OS. We use the taxonomy within the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science to systematically explore the intersection of GenAI and OS. We conclude that using GenAI could advance key OS objectives by broadening meaningful access to knowledge, enabling efficient use of infrastructure, improving engagement of societal actors, and enhancing dialogue among knowledge systems. However, due to GenAI’s limitations, it could also compromise the integrity, equity, reproducibility, and reliability of research. Hence, sufficient checks, validation, and critical assessments are essential when incorporating GenAI into research workflows.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - data
KW - impacts
KW - open science
KW - software
KW - workflows
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000153134&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1162/qss_a_00337
DO - 10.1162/qss_a_00337
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000153134
SN - 2641-3337
VL - 6
SP - 22
EP - 45
JO - Quantitative Science Studies
JF - Quantitative Science Studies
ER -