Is there a risk for bacterial transmission from surgical marker pens?

  • Petra Brinskelle
  • , Elisabeth König*
  • , Gerald Sendlhofer
  • , Kathrin Annemarie Baumhackl
  • , Raimund Winter
  • , Isabelle Sawetz
  • , Lars-Peter Kamolz
  • , Ivo Steinmetz
  • , Herwig Friedl
  • , David Benjamin Lumenta
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Markers for preoperative skin marking are used several times and bear a risk of transmitting bacteria. Bacterial contamination was assessed by sonication and culture. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed for facultative pathogens to assess multi-drug resistance (MDR). An accelerated failure time model was applied to assess the statistical relationship between the bacterial contamination and the filling status of markers. Of 45 markers, 13 had a colony count <10 cfu/mL and 32 had counts from 10 to 12,500 cfu/mL. Three markers were colonized by Staphylococcus aureus. No MDR bacteria were found. We recommend single use of markers to reduce transmission risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)254-257
Number of pages4
JournalThe Journal of Hospital Infection
Volume106
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bacterial contamination
  • Colonization
  • Markers
  • Multi-drug resistance
  • Sonication
  • Surgical site identification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is there a risk for bacterial transmission from surgical marker pens?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this