Determination of total extractable organofluorine (EOF) in food contact materials and target and non-target analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using LC–MS/MS and LC–HRMS simultaneously coupled to ICP-MS

Tengetile Nxumalo, Abdullah Akhdhar, Viktoria Müller, Amnah Al Zbedy, Andrea Raab, Milica Jovanovic, Erich Leitner, Andrew Kindness, Jörg Feldmann*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Food contact materials (FCMs) from three countries were analysed for all extractable organofluorines (EOFs) from the materials and subsequently by target and non-target analysis for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The EOF varied by two orders of magnitude for FCM from UK and Saudi Arabia ranging between 2.14 and 483 ng cm−2 (0.2–48 ng g−1) showing that one quarter of all samples were above the Danish regulation for PFAS in FCM. Target PFAS showed high variability in composition and accounted for less than 1% of the EOF. Non-target PFAS screening using HPLC–ICP-MS and coupled simultaneously to HRMS showed the occurrence of organofluorines which were identified by neither LC–MS/MS nor LC–HRMS. This illustrates that the current target PFAS approaches fail to identify EOFs from FCM, which would be a problem with the new EU proposal to ban all PFAS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)856-866
Number of pages11
JournalFood Additives and Contaminants - Part A
Volume41
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • EOF
  • fluorine determination
  • food packaging
  • HR-GFMAS
  • ICP-MS
  • mass balance
  • non-target analysis
  • per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances
  • target analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • General Chemistry
  • Toxicology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determination of total extractable organofluorine (EOF) in food contact materials and target and non-target analysis of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using LC–MS/MS and LC–HRMS simultaneously coupled to ICP-MS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this